In a few accidents, relatively large quantities of dioxins were released, from which we can learn how dangerous dioxins are in short and long term. The most remembered is the Seveso accident, where an overheated reactor emitted a cloud of reaction products, including a few hundred grams to a few kilogram of the most toxic dioxin in the neighbourhood.
See: How dangerous are dioxins?
Greenpeace and other environmental groups accuses the chlorine industry to be the main source of dioxins in the environment. In some specific cases in the past, this was true, but the whole chlorine industry and specifically the PVC-industry is only a minor source of dioxins today. In Western countries (measurements in Belgium, The Netherlands, Sweden, UK, Canada and the USA) this is only 0.1% of the dioxin releases to air. The most important sources were old incinerators, the domestic incineration of wood and the metal industry. And the amount of PVC - or chlorine - input plays no role in the amount of dioxins formed at incinerators. Only the quality of incineration matters.
See: Sources of dioxins.
Greenpeace and other environmental groups want a ban on all PVC use, because it gives dioxins when produced and incinerated. This is true for very small quantities, but they "forget" to mention that it is true for every production of materials which uses any form of heating or thermal processing. Any material that is recycled at high temperatures forms dioxins and any material which can burn will release dioxins - and much more important PAH's - when accidentaly burned or incinerated, the former completely depending on the circumstances and the latter completely depending on the quality of the incinerator.
See: Dioxin releases of materials during their life cycle.
You are at level one of the Chlorophiles pages
Created: 26 Februari, 1996.
Last update: 6 February, 2006.
For any comment on this or other pages, especially on dioxin effects:
chlorophiles@pandora.be
